Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus ZAIDA KHAN

Sections 417 and 403 of the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 161, 218 and 344 of the Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) against the accused of the evil army. The appeal was presented before a special military court. The court decided that the case was too long and complicated, they could be prosecuted and then the department presented challan in the Special Judge's Anti-Corruption Court, which prosecuted the accused under Section 265, CRPC. Made it worse. An order under jurisdiction under criminal law cannot be construed as a contract in summary military court, but most can also be treated as an advice or directive or seriously denied in this case. It could not, therefore, be dealt with by the Department for further action available to them and it was free to take any kind of conduct. Submission of invoices to the departmental inquiry or special court or both proceedings may take place simultaneously, therefore, this case did not apply; the special judge also exercised jurisdiction under Section 265, CRPC. Because he wasn't like that. It applies to a court order which results in the acquittal of the accused and consequently he is set aside and the case is referred to a special judge for trial according to law. ? solicitors from Garh More lawyer