Find a Lawyer

RAZIQ ALI versus STATE

Sections 2 302/34 & & 7 307 / App evidence Appraising evidence The presence of a complaining eye witness at the time of the incident was suspicious The identity of the assailant was not possible under certain circumstances Single eye witness was interested and someone His testimony was not confirmed. Independent evidence of an unidentified character does not support the prosecution's version of the evidence, but rather was a direct confrontation from which the recovered arms expert was not sent to formulate his opinion if he was involved in one or different weapons. Was removed from the site. It is not possible to have a shot fired by a single person, but no independent witness was presented to prove the recovery from the occasion, although a large number of people were present and the accused was acquitted. when you need a advocate from Rajanpur lawyer