Find a Lawyer

BEGUM MUMTAZ RIAZ versus PAKISTAN

Sections 17 (8) and (9) of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act 1963, the High Court, had demanded the rent controller to record evidence on certain aspects of the parties and dispose of the matter in accordance with law. The High Court shall not mean that the rent controller is barred from taking any further action permitted by law or by passing any formal order of nature as provided by Sections 17 (8) and (9). Before the rental controller's remand order, when the parties' record of evidence and the matter was settled in accordance with the law, prior to the remand order from the rental controller, they could not be prevented from being denied such favor. Did not disqualify him from exercising all the rental options and duties. Mutual orders require controllers, including the power to deal with these issues famous high court advocate from Sajawal lawyer