Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

F. REHMAN & CO. versus PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PVT. LTD.


Limitation Act 1908 Article 85 The extension suit for the period of limitation was based on open, mutual and current account where the account was set up and the parties were settled on 2 3 1984 and 19 85 198 was filed on Article 85. Delivery will apply after the plaintiff's general accounting year end date is acknowledged to the extent that the plaintiff deliberately stopped mentioning the end date when they normally closed their accounts and instead It was pointed out that the cause of action was on 5 11 1986. When they claim in favor of litigation under Article 85 by demanding payment of a letter to the party, such a case cannot be extended when the plaintiff has within three years of the calculation from the end date of the accounting period. Excludes litigation under which the address is provided solely by means of a resort. Letter of demand at a later date

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Gujrat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.