STATE versus MUKAMIL SHAH
Sections 417 and 340 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC), the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), were also not examined on the oath prescribed under section 340 (2) of the appeal against section 13 acquittal. Was not asked, nor was any question asked by the court in his statement serious misconduct for failing to comply with the provisions of this law, therefore, in this case it was brought when the affidavit alleges Investigation of the accused is an integral part of the case when three defense witnesses were examined together. Once and only one statement was recorded by them and it was unclear how they were examined and which of them answered the questions which led to the trial court's decision. And the case was remanded to the trial court. To practice the suspect's investigation phase
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Warah lawyer