MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Article 3/4 Guarantee, arguing that no one was involved in the recovery and that the accused did not cancel the former offender. had gone. Saying that in the absence of a proven motive for being accused, the policemen were as good a witness as the chemical auditor's report with the recovery of 90 grams of baggage from another person and a currency note marked by the accused. The case was confirmed. The originator, in such circumstances, was not entitled to a concession in bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Thatta lawyer