MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus STATE
Section 302/34 evidence, the FIR definition was entered after consultation and deliberation and was justified by two witnesses on the occasion of their presence which was demolished by Patwari who stated that There is no land to cultivate around them. The presence of the complainant at the scene of the incident was also proved wrong by the statement of the other witness, the outrageous sketch, and the site plan prepared by the complainant's name Patwari was not mentioned in any of these documents about the complaint. I too was against the witness. The way in which the contradictions and obvious shortcomings faced before the presence of the deceased, the sequence of events and the presence of the accused, was also not a matter of confidence and if there was a crime at any point. Couldn't safely be relied upon. Capital charge
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Hafizabad lawyer
