MUHAMMAD AZAM versus MUHAMMAD HAYAT
Section 2302/3 323 / ? Ac8 / ?9 Ac The Acquittal Trial Court, after discussing the ocular testimony, found that the eyewitnesses were interested and the illegal criminal litigation between the parties over a period of 40 years. Many of the killings were reported. Through the trial court, which provided reasons for not trusting or relying on eyewitness statements. The fact that another point of view can be formulated has also been agreed upon by the trial court parties, even though it cannot be grounds for acquittal. However, the same thing can be kept in mind, especially when criminal litigation between the parties can last for more than 40 years, thus no justification for interfering with the trial court's decision has been made. ]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Kotla Pathan lawyer
