Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SATTAR MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 439 (1) Contemporary Scope (XLV of 1860), Sections 307 and 341 The validity of the death of the applicant during the ratification of the amendment was not separate from the jurisdiction of the endorsement verdict. The order was challenged in an appeal by the State Complainant, which was legally registered and the respondents were issued proceedings by the court after satisfying the invalid order, pending the review petition. The applicant was killed; the court was satisfied that the first time illegal work was done was by the trial court. The accused may invite the court's attention to any illegal action, usually through a review petition by the trial court to acquit the complainant. The complainant was not excused from filing a review request. Where the state did not appeal against the verdict and once issued a court proceeding, it was ordered to terminate my review, even after the applicant's death:

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Kakul lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.