ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (ADMN.) NATIONAL SAVINGS CENTRE versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR
Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Removal from employment on the charge of misconduct A public servant confessed that he had been handed inappropriate money The service tribunal's finding stated that the matter was postponement of funds and included funds. Was not misused: civil servant did not appeal against the tribunal before the tribunal but merely asked for a reduction in the Criminal Service Tribunal, therefore, only those who posted the abuse search in the respective register service tribunal I was unable to change, failing to state in my judgment that he did not belong to a civil servant Chose to ignore the admission that was made before the Inquiry Officer. On the admission of a public servant, allegations of misconduct have been established and, on the contrary, the service tribunal's finding cannot be supported by allegations of misrepresentation, though for a short period against a person working in a financial institution. For, the department could not be taken lightly, therefore, it had sufficient justification: removal of a public servant from the service tribunal was not demanded to interfere with the sentence imposed on the civil servant, employed by the department Order to dismiss was reinstated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Gawadar lawyer