MUHAMMAD SAEED versus HANIFA BEGUM
Civil Procedure Code Order XXXVIII of the CPC's arrest and attachment document before Judge Proposal OXXXVIII, R5, OXL; six equal installments of the principal amount fixed by the court with the consent of the parties R1 and Section 151 Applications for the appointment of OCL, R1 and Section 151 were transferred, which was rejected by the Additional Registrar instructing the plaintiff to proceed. After the expiry of the legality of the application, the court applied for the appointment of the recipient after the expiry of six months, the order was not processed, therefore the order of the Additional Registrar was granted to the executioner. There was only one month left to do. After the order was executed, the appointment of the recipient was not considered justified, instead the court was ordered to attach the accused / property under OXXXVIII, R 5 because when under the provisions of the order Once the order becomes arbitrary upon execution, it may move to the sale of such property. Payment is not made by the defendant within the stipulated period \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Takhtbai lawyer