ZOR ENGINEERS LTD. versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN
Civil Procedure Code Order XXXXX Temporary Pairing and Interlocutory Orders OXXXIX, Rr 1 & 2 and Section 151 Interim Order Entrants were banned from suspending their tools, plants and machinery, without prior court approval. ? The petitioner requested that the property on which the trial court bans was not subject to the suit record that the applicants were not kept in check for the use of tools, plants and machinery and if they become unusable. At the request of the applicants, the court will allow them to dispose of it, in view of ensuring that the respondents will be paid in the event of success in the suit, and thus the court can take any action in this regard. Which has been properly prevented. The High Court case was declared a matter, thereby affirming the trial court's decision to grant leave and rightly acting in its inherent jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Panjan Kisan lawyer