Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SHER HAYDER versus STATE


Evidence Act 1872 Section 43 (3) Option Option (of 1878), Section 9 Evidence Act (of 1872), Section 45 Evidence, Definition of marijuana and determination of opium recovered from the accused in accordance with the chemical analyst. Was not sent or not. Whether or not there was marijuana and opium, the excise inspector was authorized to testify and under Section 45, Evidence Act 1872, the opium excise inspector could not be treated as expert witness and the cannabis and opium recovered from the accused. Four were not proven and in the absence of such a report by opium experts, the sentence could not be sustained.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Bahawalnagar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.