Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

JAVAID AKHTAR NAWAZ versus MEHR KABIR


At the request of the plaintiff, the Civil Procedure Code Order XVII of CPC Adjustments OXVII, R3, the trial was postponed on different dates, but their evidence was not closed on those postponed dates, instead. Was not postponed. The preliminary adjournment on the defendant's request, on the subsequent date, would not constitute a reasonable basis for closing his evidence at a later date, after which the case was not adjourned on his request, where the evidence was closed. The hearing was in such a postponement date, neither the defendant nor his lawyer was present in the court, a proper course for the trial court was held, when the case was called, action was to be taken against it.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Warah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.