GULAN ALIAS GUL MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Articles 2 & 2 and ??? ?? Judicial confessions that were withdrawn from the review of evidence, which were not recorded in accordance with the law, had natural defects and setbacks and were not confirmed in evidence by material evidence, safely. Could not be relied upon, no eyewitnesses were present and nothing was recovered. The suspect was given the benefit of the doubt and was acquitted in the circumstances to link the accused to the crime.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Bolan lawyer
