NAWAB KHATOON versus SADAR DIN
Sindh Tenant Premise Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) (vii) Personal Evidence Required The evidence on record shows that the husband of the landlord for whom it was claimed that he wanted in good faith to run his business. , Had gifted its own shop. Just three months before the current rent lawsuit was filed, evidence also showed her son that another landlord's shop was vacant at that time, that he was renting more, the landlord's husband said in his oath. The document stated in the evidence that she was unemployed. But in cross-examination, he stated that he was running a business in the shop given by the municipality in partnership with another person on behalf of the municipality. The fact that the landlord refused to rent to the tenant without any reason, also shows that he intends to prepare a ground for eviction. The maneuver was defeated by the tenant, who showed caution by sending the rent through a money order and then submitted it to the court when the money orders were forbidden by the landlord.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Makli lawyer