Find a Lawyer

SHABBIR HUSSAIN SHAH versus STATE

Evidence 302/34 and 404/34 testimony was not appreciated by eyewitnesses who witnessed the incident which was unexpected when the FIR was filed after an unusual delay and many improvements to the prosecutor's story mirror. The witnesses claimed that the suspect was inappropriate identification The parade proceedings were not credible because the witnesses lost evidence of the recovery of the accused and the footprints as the suspects were shown the date of his actual arrest. Was arrested before and the tracker had the possibility of obtaining the judicial confession of the accused. Went to There was no denying that even after using Third Degree methods, he himself was acquitted of the charges of exclusion. best advocate from Fateh Jang lawyer