TARIQ versus STATE
Sections 302 and 109/34, the testimony of the immediate FIR, presented the complainant's presence in the village where he was visiting his widow's sister on Eid day and some of the complainant's presence in his sister's village. Also not found wrong. On the day of Eid, the complainant was the victim's cousin and for the real culprits, such substitution of the accused was not credible. And the witnesses, who were falsely involved in the proposal, also tended to show their presence on the occasion, and the presence of eyewitnesses cannot be doubted. Medical evidence was found to have ocular evidence stained with human blood. Such evidence, thus, could not be removed from the sentence. Maintained under conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Shahdad Pur lawyer
