Find a Lawyer

ZUBAIDA versus STATE

Criminal offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Sections 540, 164 and 342 of the Evidence Act (I of 1872), Section 165 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203F Zina Pulia of the bride-to-be appealed for a hearing, took notice of the statement made by the female accused (applicant) under Sec 164, CCPC, to understand that she had committed sexual homosexuality, Neither paid any attention to the other part nor performed its duty under the section. 540, CCPC and section 1765, the Evidence Act, 1872 to seek justice for at least the evidence of the documents lying in his records, for example there was a marriage contract in which the male accused was Y. History. 3 197 1973 was on record while his maid was with complainant M. The date of 30, 1983, 1983, 83 was scored in 83 and 73 was written while the name of the female accused registered with M in the marriage register was written on the score register when both courts took notice of it. Strong Elements in Failure to Protect The two main dependent elements in the conduct of the female accused (applicant) were that she had expelled her children from the complainant's bows and if they had married these children in the complainant's marriage. If she gives birth, she can justify her marriage to the accused without the need to divorce the complainant in such a defense version. Explaining bad elements that were not properly noted, in its statement under section 342, the female accused was wrongly asked a comprehensive question about a valid marriage with the complainant and the child The legitimate birth of which he denied family advocate from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer