Find a Lawyer

RAISUDDIN versus THE STATE

The testimony of the prosecution witness examined the testimony of section 13 (e) of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 to prove the recovery of the dagger. came. The accused was not recovered, but the person from whom the dagger was recovered from another person was not locked. According to the counselor, the first police and the accused went inside the room and then they and the co-adviser were called. And thus there was every possibility that the dagger might have been set up there by the police prosecution; 46 had failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt against the defendant in the case. ? advocate for immigration from Murree lawyer