VAZIR ALI versus HANIF
The appellant temporarily ruled that the CPC temporarily injected injunctions and interlocutory orders, XXXX, RR1 and 2 provisional injunctive appeals, petitioned the appellant to temporarily approve the injunction against the defendant. Accusing him of violating the terms and conditions, he was asked to prevent any construction on his plot. The plaintiffs had allowed the respondent to construct a fourth floor on the two-storey floor, other than the lower floor, at their own risk, and nothing subject to the decision of the case was on record. The Building Control Authority has made an exception to the affidavit and respondent's affidavits make it clear that respondents have completed building filing on the third floor of the building, except for the completion of the building. Interruption at such a stage with completion will not be appropriate nor will the defendant refuse to grant injunction \ Was \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Qalandarabad lawyer