Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AZIMULLAH versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL


Code of Conduct 1908 Section 114 and III R4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 199 Revision Request Ex-Part Order The applicant prays for withdrawal of the former party order and for hearing the constitutional petition on the basis that he was not heard. A statement of facts which shows that initially, the applicant, who was the respondent in the writ petition, engaged with a lawyer who filed a written statement but after that the applicant turned to another lawyer. To appear before, who had not yet been charged a fee, however he appeared to protect the interest. The decision of the applicant's presence and his presence was decided in Sheet I; the request for review on the basis of the applicant's request that he not be heard was rejected.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocate from Turbat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.