Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AZIMULLAH versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL


Code of Conduct 1908 Section 114 and III R4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 199 Revision Request Ex-Part Order The applicant prays for withdrawal of the former party order and for hearing the constitutional petition on the basis that he was not heard. A statement of facts which shows that initially, the applicant, who was the respondent in the writ petition, engaged with a lawyer who filed a written statement but after that the applicant turned to another lawyer. To appear before, who had not yet been charged a fee, however he appeared to protect the interest. The decision of the applicant's presence and his presence was decided in Sheet I; the request for review on the basis of the applicant's request that he not be heard was rejected.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Manga Mandi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.