JAN MUHAMMAD versus CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, AUQAF
Balochistan Waqf Properties Ordinance 1979 Section 11 Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), OXXII1, R1 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The claimants filed an application challenging this notification under which the Waqf Properties District The court was dismissed. Claimants' request, but because the High Court dismissed the plea bargaining, claiming for relief, two claims for leave were filed by the claimants to appeal against the same High Court decision, which is the claim. That an application was made under section 11 of the Ordinance IV of Ordinance IV of 1979, OXXI, RC, and the view by the High Court that the reasons for the provisions of OXXIII, R1, CPC This request was banned due to. And that the High Court also found that the remaining property was the request of the Respondents of the Dedicated Property that the High Court withheld the application under section 11 of Ordinance IV of 1979, which on its merits There was an error adjusting the conflict. Given a portion of the relief offered in support of the case and both applications, the appeal deserves a leave of consideration
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Attock lawyer