Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE


Section 5 (2) of the Conduct Rule (186 (XLV 186)), Section 161/34 Definition of Evidence In its statement to correct and improve the case, the old woman was charged with district corruption inspector anti-corruption. Acceptance of payment for payment and other witnesses did not have the funds to be released The only independent witness, the raiding magistrate, did not hear any conversation between them, and the complainant and the accused pleaded with the district health officer to provide it. Money was given to him and he was not accepted because the defendant's version could be valid in view of the complainant's testimony, the perpetrator was passing. S money, caught, can not take legal views against the accused and complainant A statement based on the conviction can not safely. Ccused was entitled to take advantage of such situations ordered Acquittal

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Mirpur Khas lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.