MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE
Section 5 (2) of the Conduct Rule (186 (XLV 186)), Section 161/34 Definition of Evidence In its statement to correct and improve the case, the old woman was charged with district corruption inspector anti-corruption. Acceptance of payment for payment and other witnesses did not have the funds to be released The only independent witness, the raiding magistrate, did not hear any conversation between them, and the complainant and the accused pleaded with the district health officer to provide it. Money was given to him and he was not accepted because the defendant's version could be valid in view of the complainant's testimony, the perpetrator was passing. S money, caught, can not take legal views against the accused and complainant A statement based on the conviction can not safely. Ccused was entitled to take advantage of such situations ordered Acquittal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Mirpur Khas lawyer