Find a Lawyer

MANSAB KHAN versus STATE

Section 302/34 praised Defense Deepika, who was subjected to sudden and serious provocation and injured the accused on the charge of using the right defense but was not motivated by trust and was found guilty of the fact that her defense request was not only her Cheated by nature. The injured persons were also found out that the accused was not to receive the day of the injuries, since the recovery of blood-stained land from two days also reinforced the requirement of the prosecutor that after the brutal assault, the accused had received them. Home trial In view of the relationship of the witnesses, the court had properly sought a collusion which would come up against only two accused. There is no doubt that a recovery witness was related to the subpoena, but in this regard the statement of the investigating officer. Cannot be ignored which has no enmity against the accused. Swords and hatcheries have been recovered on their weapons of crime and the offer of the accused. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Chak Sheza lawyer