STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN versus MUSARRAT ENTERPRISES (REGD.)
Section 27A&83 (1D) Evidence Appraisal Firm was neither a banking company nor a corporation or federal government authority or a company to submit publicity through advertising in public media. The authoritatively authorized advertisement could not satisfy the public-provided explanation by this firm, which the accused says is one of the company's partners, also section 38 of the Ordinance of Banking Companies, 1962 ( 1D) proved with record charge under section 27A read with. , Beyond any reasonable doubt, proved against the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Kamra lawyer
