MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus STATE
Sections 2302 / & 34 & 5 325 // 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Ocular testimony was considered credible which confirmed the medical evidence as well as the recovery of the crime weapon on the occasion of the accused motive. Happened. Established by credible evidence, when there was no material available to support the defense version, the compromise between the parties was reportedly unusual because the suspects were already sentenced and the accused were convicted. Were well established and were not responsible for the intervention. The three-day ban, the pros and cons were considered
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Diamer lawyer
