SHAFI MUHAMMAD versus MUZAFFAR-UD-DIN
Civil Procedure Code Order VIII and OVIII of the CPC's written statement, R10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 Defense, striking the respondents, filing in writing on approximately 11 30 Requested an extension to. When the trial court dismissed his defense, a written statement was also submitted along with a request to call the said order at around 00 pm the same day, which was rejected by the district judge in review. Yes, the written statement was rejected by the order. The order and order were being followed till 4 pm, the closing hours of the court were unapproved; petitioner's writ petition against the order of the district judge was dismissed, the High Court dismissing the constitutional petition rightly. I was convinced that there was nothing wrong with that. In the jurisdiction of the Constitution, the intervention of the District Judge's order was identified and the order was reasonable and no intervention was required.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer
