Sections 302/34, 307/34 and 100 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), the testimony of section 13E, proved to be an indictment of the incident that took place inside the home of the injured accused, of which the prosecution Did not specify. Witnesses to attack the suspect belonged to the complainant as well and they came from far away The evidence of the recovery of the weapons of crime from the accused was inconsistent, unnecessary and unreliable recovered articles after considerable delay. Was sent to the Examiner which was not specified. The accused, detained, had all the right to private defense under the circumstances and was consequently acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
