MUHAMMAD AMIN versus THE STATE
Section 302 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance (VII I 1979), SS 10 (3) and 11 Criminal Procedure Code (V 18158), Section 164 on charges of kidnapping, adultery and murder of a 6-year-old girl The confessional statement of the accused in the evidence in which he was prosecuted by the prosecutor restored his case to the confession of the kidnapper and, after taking her to various places, committed the abuse and the ear ring kept her secure. Strangled Such a statement was later denied and it was alleged that the witnesses had refrained from their statements and were declared admissible in the trial court and there was no recovery. The trial case was based on incidents in which no eyewitness was present. It is true that it was not illegal for an accused to base his conviction on a statement made under Section 160, CR P C, after which the statement was later withdrawn, but in spite of this
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Bewal lawyer
