Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SANAULLAH versus THE STATE


In the Pakistan Penal Code Section 409 Proof of Act (Constitution of 1872), section 63 evidence defining the evidence was taken by the Investigation Officer, neither the Inquisition Officer nor the prosecution witness stated that the photocopies were the original documents and Records have seen. Do not disclose who obtained the photograph of the documents which could not be submitted to the court without a case for preparation of secondary evidence under section, Ev, Evidence Act, 1872, to be sent for original. After comparing, the photocopies with them should also be kept on file, which are lawful. The photocopies are not admissible in such evidence, and no other evidence is relevant to the crime. ?

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Phagwar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.