Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AMIR SARDAR versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 497, 4911) and, 513 Impeachment Code (XLV of 1860), SS 436, 302 307/149 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodwood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), section 17 ( 4) In both cases it was illegal for the accused to demand cash security for the bribe of Rs 50,000 in each case on the cash security of his offer to the accused, as the criminal code for supporting such order. There was no clause in the code that the court could accept cash. Security may be appropriate to the extent such protection is offered by the accused under 5CP 513, CCPC, but the court cannot insist on cash security, with CRPC guaranteeing on bond execution. It also considers that the Sessions Court's deposit orders were modified by the Cash High Court to such an extent that in this case the accused has to pay Rs. 50,000 in each case to settle the case. Will be released on bail.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Khanewal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.