IRSHAD AHMAD versus STATE
Section 302/34 Evidence, testimony by the trial court of any of the two witnesses who satisfactorily described his death and did not remain with him at the time of the incident. Couldn't believe because nothing was revealed. There was no contradiction between the interim investigation and statements regarding the location of the investigating officer's FIR recording, both eyewitnesses were not interested witnesses, but their testimony led to the gun's recovery and the incident. Recovery proved to be empty. The trial court charged the trial court with a gun, forgery, and was sentenced to death and sentenced to death.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Tharo Shah lawyer
