Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NIAZ MUHAMMAD versus STATE


Appreciate the Section 13B evidence of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 that Padash's Inspector Police made no attempt to arrange an independent witness before or during the raiding operation, which he could have easily done, and on his own. Was convinced by the evidence and his head constable had made the prosecution's case very doubtful that the contradictions in the deployment of police officers could be trivial in themselves, but when viewed in the background of the absence of an independent witness. If so, he took on greater importance and corroded the fact of the prosecution's evidence. The police found the story of the hen and the bull nothing but the prosecution's story, so it was incredible and could not stand on its own feet, even if Defense Voice 4 was ignored altogether. Was acquitted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Dijkot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.