FATEH KHAN versus RAB NAWAZ KHAN
The CCC Code of Conduct appeals to the original RPL CPC CPC. The ALL, R33 court order should be binding on the parties unless a party is put aside in the proper proceedings unless a decree is to be laid against it; Must be modified or reversed. Apply to file an appeal with certain requirements, contradictory objections, and as a general rule, the appellate court should not reverse or alter an order in favor of a party who appealed against it. Or cross objections, despite the provision of O XL, R 33 CP, CPC LOLI, CPC R 33, however, the court in such exceptional cases Gives the power to approve an order or order which must be approved or the nature of the matter may be required, even if such interpretation is in favor of the non-appealing parties. Those who have not preferred the appeal against the trial court's order in O XLI, R 33, and the CPC are at the discretion of the court, even when an opportunity demands, and necessary justice is required, the court Must perform its duty and should not refuse to exercise its sole discretion solely on the basis that prior to the request of the provisions of O XLI, R 33 of the High Court, the party did not appeal or He did not object. The CPC court reviewed the shares held by the trial court on the wrongdoers' shares, though its recipients failed to file an appeal or file an objection to the wrongful determination of the heirs and their shares.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Daud Khel lawyer