MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus THE PRESIDENT, NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI
Article 15 (1) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction Authority to Reject Service Restitution Order for Relief on the basis of any stolen document containing restitution order of employees. No one can benefit Because he was never delivered, he complained. Although the applicant's conduct in relation to relief was always relevant and he could be denied relief if a person came in with unclean hands, he could not be denied even if he was entitled to relief. , Because he submitted a document. Or the letter not sending him the letter is to be sent on the merit of the request. The restoration order was formally delivered to the concerned office with copies, the applicant would know the employee and a copy of the same was kept. Was. To comply with this, the employee cannot be considered to steal this letter, nor can he be denied relief on this basis, without any legal authority nor any legal order restoring recovery. Impact was declared, even then the first order of rehabilitation of employees was present in this field and it was required to be implemented by the authority.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Mian Chunnu lawyer