MUHAMMAD DIN versus MRS. ZA. MALIK
Pakistan Penal Code Section 9409/9419/20201/888/1 Act1 Corruption Act (Second 1947), Section 5 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Complaint against the accused It was not established that if the applicant was allowed by the trial court to present further evidence that he could establish his case against the defendant's motive, the applicant did not have any letter of appointment in which It was reported that he was a school employee in which the headmistress petitioner could not produce any documents. Showing that he never acted as a guardian at the aforementioned school, nor did he show anything that would make it seem that he received his salary from school funds, even to them. There is no service book to present the High Court rightly found that even if the applicant had been allowed to present the entire evidence, it would not serve any purpose for leave to appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Chowk Maitla lawyer
