Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD DIN versus MRS. ZA. MALIK


Pakistan Penal Code Section 9409/9419/20201/888/1 Act1 Corruption Act (Second 1947), Section 5 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Complaint against the accused It was not established that if the applicant was allowed by the trial court to present further evidence that he could establish his case against the defendant's motive, the applicant did not have any letter of appointment in which It was reported that he was a school employee in which the headmistress petitioner could not produce any documents. Showing that he never acted as a guardian at the aforementioned school, nor did he show anything that would make it seem that he received his salary from school funds, even to them. There is no service book to present the High Court rightly found that even if the applicant had been allowed to present the entire evidence, it would not serve any purpose for leave to appeal.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Lakimarwat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.