Find a Lawyer

SHAH BAKHSH versus STATE

Article 2302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (21) (a) Appreciating the evidence was a separate reason and different explanation for establishing his presence on the occasion of the presence of all the prosecution witnesses, with the adjudicator closely Contradictions in the conduct of the relatives and medical evidence, which were not noted by the two courts below, the presence of witnesses was highly doubtful. Ocular evidence related to the actual incident contradicted the medical evidence of the natural and unwanted witness. Was declared unnecessary and it was difficult. Make such an opinion about the importance of his testimony, that the recovery of the vacancy, even if it was established, could not have been done much more because the rifle recovery could not have been reliably established when the accused was identified. The accused's fugitive action was not proved. Thus, reasonable doubt did not prove beyond doubt that the accused was acquitted. best law firm from Dhoun Kal lawyer