G.M. NIZAMUDDIN versus ABDUL RAHIM
The PCs did not, in this case, pass the order under section 14165 (1) of the Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) sections 6161A and ?5 ((?) ()). Applied his mind to the court, and did not give any reason for its origin. Such action and thus the law did not comply with the essential requirement under which no material was available on the record to enable the trial court to cope with any type of emergency in determining the case as an emergency. Was, as both CRPC orders passed. The court attaches to the disputed property only because of the situation created by the parties in its court and further on the basis that the matter cannot be resolved immediately unless the property is sealed, prevented, legalized. Not to be confronted and in these cases the trial proceeded to the court under trial. In accordance with the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Jhal Magsi lawyer
