MUHAMMAD SAIFULLAH KHAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Arts 188, 199 and 58 (2) (b) Rules of the Supreme Court, 1980, OXXV Civil Administrative Regulation (v. 1908), A XLVII, R 1 The basis for review is that of the Supreme Court. It is believed that the National Assembly is in existence. As a result of the 1985 general elections, the President unlawfully dissolved on the 29th 1988 1988, after which the National Assembly could not be stopped from working until March, 1990, until the end of its 5-year general term. ? And in doing so, the Supreme Court committed an error regarding the nature of the orders where the court could pass under Article 199 of the Constitution where a conscious and deliberate decision was made regarding the nature of the orders, which the court authorized had gone. To pass under a law clause (Article 199) simply because there could be another theory about it canvas and it could not constitute a place for review.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Vehari lawyer