MUHAMMAD AYUB versus SHABBIR HUSSAIN
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 888888 ()) After the applicant's service, the applicant appeared in court on different dates but eventually appeared before himself, on which a previous order was passed against which he was able to record. There was ample evidence to deliberately ignore attendance in court. The clarification offered by the trial magistrate was rejected by the trial magistrate in order to obtain the pre-requisite order rendered by the petitioner for deciding the reinstatement, and he was denied that the applicant was required to comply with the law. Was forced to set aside the application within three months in order to obtain a pre-order order. Order Date The request for separation of the ex parte order was thus clearly out of time and no substance was found to be delayed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Hala lawyer
