Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Constitution No 3 and 5 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Movement Non-confidence The Chairman of the Union Council did not face a motion of no-confidence nor had the authority to suspend / suspend the same chairman for whom The presiding officer had to wait. The purpose, in due course of time, was because the chairman of the majority of the members against whom the motion for no-confidence was raised, thus holding the meeting in place, could not take advantage of it so that he could take advantage of his wrong. Allows The majority of the voters who voted in favor of antitrust support were present in the court to support their dissent against the chairman, who, in fact, withdrew from the court in his favor. jobs for fresh advocates from Kot Mithan lawyer