NAZIR ALI versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SIALKOT
RR 3 and 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Sections 4 (1) (C) and 8 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) of the Government Employee must be retired on charges of corruption. After a government employee's appeal failed, he tried to remedy the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court, dismissing his appeal on the basis of an appeal before the Punjab Service Tribunal, disqualified for retirement sentence. Was declared because the appellant was denied any relief against the order passed before 1st July. Under the 1969 High Court order, the appeal of a public servant was considered before the Supreme Court because the High Court was not justifying the issue under which the application of the Constitution was made under section 8 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act. Was implemented under On June 20, 1974, under the provisions of this section, the Punjab Service Tribunal appealed, failing to take notice of Section 4 (1) (c) of the High Court of Punjab b Service Tribunals Act, 1974,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer