GUL MUHAMMAD versus NASIR AHMAD
Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) based on the personal need of the landlord and his sons, the tenant's eviction request for eviction and the reconstruction of the building was rejected by the rent controller but in the appeal It was only then he was accepted and the decision was made. In the constitutional jurisdiction, the main tenant consensus by the High Court is that the application for approval of the municipal committee for the reconstruction of the building by the landlord did not include the number of shops, thus approval was not valid and it was not That the request for personal need was accepted. It was not established by untrue evidence, it was also raised before the High Court and its accuracy was met by the High Court verdict.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Tharo Shah lawyer
