Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ABBAS versus SANAULLAH

5 302/307/323/324 Appeals for appeals by both the guilty and the complaining party were accepted by both the trial court and the High Court for general testimony and there was no reason for the Supreme Court to take a different view. Was. The attack was premature and the conviction of the perpetrators was based on the testimony of natural witnesses who had no reason to make false accusations. The High Court had already given the guilty the least benefit of the culprits. Therefore, the complainant was dismissed. The High Court challenged the reduction of sentence to life imprisonment. It was the prosecutor's case that the purpose of restoring the family honor was to validate the court-imposed death sentence. Was unwilling to interfere in the arbitration proceedings of the High Court. Complainant Party denies conviction by trial court leave registration advocate from Pirpai lawyer