Article 185 (3) Applicants of succession filed suit against the claimants based on their claim and claim of permanent injunction that the last male holder has left only one son to inherit his property, especially the widow himself. Claimed to be and the daughters of the last owner laid down their claim. The suit was dismissed by filing nominees and birth entries, and the applicant also failed to appeal and review the applicants, apart from being established by other evidence, as a mother. It was confirmed that his father was not on record. This shows that the defendant was not married to the adjournment. The timely result did not yield any error in the definition of evidence, legal or otherwise refused to appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
