Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD KHALID KHAN versus SHER ZAMAN


Controversy in the pre-discrimination court fee of Article 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), admits that the matter was covered by the decision to be reported as Siddiq Khan's PLD 1984 SC 289. But he argued that the question of uma infamy uma would be needed. According to Abdul Hamid, in 1988 in SCMR 333, in the case of Siddiq Khan's title, the decision in Siddiq Khan's case was not brought to the Supreme Court, and that in any case, Muhammad Iqbal Bai and others were inspected for approval of Abdul Hameed's leave. In Siddiq Khan's case, `` contradiction '' did not come under the definition of interference. No intervention was justified.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Gambet lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.