Article 185 (3) The dispute over the question of whether the respondent's offer was made by the Revenue Officer before the Revenue Officer, the community elders took an oath from the Holy Quran that he was not a son (predecessor in interest). So he expelled her. Procedure for reopening the case in civil courts, evidence added by the witnesses in favor of the defendant in the courts before the Civil Courts 1 was a lawyer and proves the fact that the defendant was RFM Dungus He had a legitimate son and was not banned from civil court points. The appellate court accepted the defendant's appeal to question the facts and came to the correct conclusion and the high court did not intervene properly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.