Arts ? (185 ()) and 199 respondents money The money recovery case, previously dismissed on the charge of non-prosecution, was subsequently reinstated by the petitioner against the restitution order and at the same time. His constitutional application was dismissed, thereby seeking leave of appeal. As shown by the respondents, the refusal by the High Court on the issue of restitution - limitation was sufficient, in its discretionary constitutional jurisdiction, not capable of interfering with the Supreme Court, in the matter. Refused to appeal the case
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
