versus
R, Punjab Government Tribunals Act (IX of 44 of the 44), Government employees were authorized to take disciplinary proceedings under Section 4 of the General and Harmful Misconduct, where misconduct was common and harmless and cheated. Not even taking action for the yogurt commission. Fraudulent and corrupt, however, had to be executed on clear grounds where the authority acted against a civil servant and sentenced censured fines to the admitted facts, the service tribunal would be in no position to reduce the fine. The censorship was punished. The lowest penalty service tribunal was of the view that the penalties imposed on civil servants should not hinder a public servant while considering their progress.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Kandiaro lawyer